I was rather busy with my research this week, so no time for a long-winded post like some of my previous updates. There's not much interesting to say anyway. This week was mostly spent on little fixes to get my current pull request merged.
Topping the list of things that are better than they were last week is speed.
The profiling I did last week
showed that the current function sympy.physics.mechanics
uses to solve a
system of linear equations (_mat_inv_mul
) is sloooooooooow. The underlying
reason is because subs
is slow - more on that later. I spent some time
swapping out all forms of solving ($A x = B$) for LUsolve
, the clear winner
of last weeks benchmarks. This resulted in a 10x speedup of the formulation of
equations for the bicycle model example.
This bicycle example has become the bane of my existence for the last couple weeks. It's a super slow test that I'd never actual gotten to run before. But with the speed improvements made, it actual finishes in a reasonable time. Except it still doesn't work. I'm able to run all the way up to
M, A, B = KM.linearize()
But when I go to sub in values for symbols in these matrices, things get hairy. There are two issues:
nan
when not simplifiedM.subs(val_dict)
results in nan
and oo
upon after subs
. But doesn't
if it's simplified before the subs. An example of this behavior would be:
>>> M = sin(q1)/tan(q1)
>>> M.subs({q1: 0}
nan
Note that if this is simplified, this results in something completely different:
>>> M = sin(q1)/tan(q1)
>>> M = M.trigsimp()
>>> M
cos(q1)
>>> M.subs({q1: 0})
1
However, for the bicycle case M has over 19 thousand operations. This doesn't
simplify quickly. Also, by default we don't simplify before subs
in
Linearizer
(you can opt in to simplify, but it's done right before the return,
so it won't affect the subbed result at all). Right now I'm looking through
ways to make the resulting expressions smaller after the formulation, as this
will result in speedups for all operations. This could be extremely helpful
for issue 2...
subs
is slowbecause A
has over 38 million operations!!! In this case subs
doesn't even
return. Ever. I left it running on my computer for 4 hours and came back and it
was still whirring along, fans on high, eating up all my ram. No idea how to
solve this. One possible solution is csympy,
a fast core written in C++. Once this matures, subs
, trigsimp
, and other
time consuming operations used heavily in sympy.physics.mechanics
could rely
on the equivalent, faster, C++ versions. I filed an issue with an example
expression generated from the bicycle example (this one only had 147,841
operations, not nearly as bad). Hopefully Ondrej and the team can use this
as a benchmark problem to help improve subs
in csympy.
If you have thoughts on how to overcome these issues, please let me know. I'm kind of stumped right now.
I didn't want to end this post on a bad note, so I'll close with the remainder of the things I did last week that actually worked:
Improved documentation! Docstrings that are worth reading, and a start on the sphinx documentation.
Added a deprecation warning for KanesMethod.linearize
to warn people about
the method change.
Major interface changes. Now all operating points are specified as a single
dictionary, or an iterable of dictionaries. This is to aid in consistency across
different system implementations. Referring to a dictionary as u_op
in
LagrangesMethod
doesn't really make any sense, as Lagrange's method only uses
$q$, $\dot{q}$, and $\ddot{q}$. Also added a kwarg to make simplification of the
results optional.
Added a method to the LagrangesMethod
class to calculate the value of the
multipliers at different points. This is useful for multiple reasons. The
multipliers have meaning, so knowing what the solution is symbolically is nice
for calculating the constraint forces. Also, when linearizing with Lagrange's
method, the multipliers have operating points as well, and these need to be
calculated based on the operating point for the other states ($q$, $\dot{q}$,
etc...). Now a user can go:
op_point = dict_or_iterable_of_dicts
lam_op = LM.solve_multipliers(op_point)
op_point.append(lam_op) # Or op_point.update if op_point is a dict, not a list of dicts
M, A, B = LM.linearize(q_ind=q_ind, qd_ind=qd_ind, op_point=op_point)
Hopefully in the next week I can get my PR merged, so the Lagrange stuff can finally be submitted.
All content copyright 2014-2017 Jim Crist unless otherwise noted. Licensed under Creative Commons.
Find me on Twitter, GitHub, Speaker Deck, or shoot me an email.